Second hour: Investigative reports: Claims of Russian Hacking from all over the World: what does GCHQ do!; easy to conceal the origin of an attack; Western Intelligence Agencies and Information Warfare; CNN article: UK blames Russian military for reckless cyber attacks, Britain, Australia and New Zealand have accused Russian military intelligence of carrying out a worldwide campaign of "malicious" cyber attacks, including the hacking of the US Democratic National Committee in 2016. British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said in a statement Thursday that the countrys National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) had found that Russian GRU intelligence service operatives were behind cyber attacks believed to have cost the global economy millions of dollars. Australia and New Zealand released similar statements alleging that their own intelligence agencies had found evidence of Russian involvement in the same attacks on political, business, media and sporting institutions; Wikileaks broke US election fixing story; Anna Holligan on BBC â about Russian GRU agents outside Global Chemical Weapons Watchdog OPCW building in The Hague â trying to hack in; Is this what the Russian agents learned in The Hague? OPCW said Skripal poison may have been BZ nerve gas not Novichok; Russiaâs foreign minister has claimed Sergei and Yulia Skripal were not poisoned by nerve agent novichok, but a separate chemical possessed by the UK and US. Sergei Lavrov said Moscow had received information from a laboratory in Spiez, Switzerland suggesting the Russian double agent and his daughter were exposed to a non-lethal substance known as BZ. He claimed the laboratory had passed Russia confidential information after analysing samples of the agent used in the attack on the Skripals in Salisbury last month. - Israeli assassin article: SKRIPAL CASE: ISRAELI EXPERT ALEXANDER BRASS ON THE WORK OF THE SPECIAL AGENTS: An Israeli expert on international terrorism, writer Alexander Brass, shared his view on the case of the Skripals poisoning in Salisbury. Brass draws parallels between the work of the special services of Israel and Russia â he believes that if to compare the British version with the practice of the special agents, then the absurdity becomes obvious. âAlexander, so what, in your opinion, happened in Salisbury?â â There was a rough provocation by the British special services. In my opinion, this is obvious.  â Why do you think so? â âThereâs a lot of stupidity on stupidity.â The story with Petrov and Boshirov does not hold up any professional peer review. According to the Brits, the Skripals were poisoned by GRU agents (this is what the department is called, although this is now the Main Directorate of the RF General Staff). I want to explain how the special services work. If you need someone to eliminate, then this is a very serious operation, which is being prepared for a long time. A very significant material and human resource is allocated. We are talking about dozens of employees. On the territory of this state, an âadvanced command postâ is being created. In the operation, a technical support group, a logistic group, a cover group, an external surveillance group and a group of performers are involved. The performers themselves appear at the very last moment. They do not go anywhere, lighting up on cameras, do not use public transport, but move on rented cars, which they do not rent themselves. And the more they will not stop in hotels, but will live on safe houses provided by the logistics group. Such groups do not come under the passport of their country, do not go to the embassy for obtaining a visa, leaving fingerprints. This is complete nonsense. Professionals do not work that way. If the GRU acted, both the killers and the other participants in the operation would come to the UK on the passports of other countries that have visa-free relations with it. Here, two alleged GRU officers go to the embassy, ââleave their fingerprints there, get a visa, stop at the hotel, pass under all the cells. This you will not find even in ladiesâ detective novels; Theresa Mayâs speech about the dangers of Putin, and Corbynâs security policies. Plants more resilient to insects â biological weapon. US Ambassador to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchison appeared to threaten war against Russia in comments Tuesday, saying the US was prepared to preemptively âtake outâ certain Russian missiles that the US objects to Russia having. Hutchison added that Russia was âon noticeâ that the US was prepared to launch preemptive military strikes against them, and would not allow Russia to keep any missiles that the US believes are in violation of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty. Attacking Russia would be a serious issue, whether or not US officials believe they have a treaty pretext to justify it. Russian officials were quick to warn that they donât think people making such statements realize the âdanger of aggressive rhetoric.â www.AntiWar.com. Pentagon â strikes legalâ if partners are benefiting from attack. Mattis â taking out missiles. Interview with Barry Wynne, former SAS Officer, about the Batang Kali Massacre in Malaysia in 1948 and the jungle warfare he took part in. Lopresti family of Filton and Bradley Stoke MP, Freemasonry and ice cream fame â claims of slavery and assault by staff. Windows on World event about local government being privatised â by Mark Windows and Piers Corbyn. Did you know that 64% of populations in âdemocraciesâ stated that their governments ârarely or never act in the public interest?"
![<?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/rp-navimg.gif)
![Support the <?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/support.png)
